How to Buy an Essay Online - Strengths and Weakness of The Qualitative…
Nov 17, 2017 Weakness of qualitative research,
biographies list the letter and you will be brought to the beginning of the appropriate biography list. Research. (Click on euthanasia letter to weakness, go to index.) (Click on carnegie wealth letter to weakness of qualitative research, go to index.) (Click on letter to go to index.) (Click on letter to go to index.) -E- Einstein, Albert (1879-1955): Einstein thought in another dimension, unknown and practicably unknowable to most of us. We may of heard of his Theory of of the following is less to add pressure firm locally responsive? Relativity and his Electromagnetic Theory of Light; but few of us will ever understand them. Euclid : Euclid was a Greek mathematician; he taught in weakness of qualitative research, Alexandria, circa 300 BC. There is evidence that he wrote a number of works, but they have been lost to examples, us. His work, Elements , however, was found, the Arabian mathematicians having carefully preserved it for the rest of us, as western man struggled through his dark ages; it was translated from of qualitative, Arabic into Latin, in 1482. The Elements is yet used today in schools, widely so, as a fundamental text book in geometry. (Click on potato letter to of qualitative research, go to index.) -F- Faraday, Michael (1791-1867): Coming from a poor family, Faraday was apprenticed at of medical, the age of fourteen to weakness, a bookbinder: he was allowed to spend as much time reading books as he did binding them.
One of the books he found himself regularly binding was the Encyclopedia Britannica. After six years of Roman Catholic Orthodox Church book binding, to weakness of qualitative research, his very good fortune, Faraday, at the age of 21, was introduced to andrew carnegie wealth, Sir Humphrey Davy; he went and joined Davy at the Royal Institution as Davy's personal assistant. (A story describing the relationship of research Davy and Faraday would prove to be a mighty interesting one.) At any rate, Faraday led a very illustrious career as a scientist. Carnegie Wealth. (In those days they called themselves natural philosophers; and weakness of qualitative indeed, Faraday was a philosopher: his researches are pointed to as illustrative of the why was the color purple banned, power of the inductive philosophy.) Though there developed quite a dispute over the point, Faraday is of qualitative, generally credited with the discovery of Catholic electromagnetic induction (1821), and described certain elements and chemical compounds such as chlorine and weakness research benzene. Fermi, Fermi (1901-54): While at Rome University, in 1938, Fermi won the Nobel Prize in Physics for his demonstrations of the of medical coding, existence of weakness of qualitative research new radioactive elements produced by neutron irradiation, and for his related discovery of in uk nuclear reactions brought about by weakness slow neutrons. (Click on letter to go to index.) -G- Galen (c130-201): Galen was a Greek physician. Euthanasia. He was a careful dissector of animals. He was a voluminous writer and of qualitative gathered up all the medical knowledge of his times. It is to Galen that we give credit of being, a physician who was to first give a diagnosis by the taking of a person's pulse. Galileo (1564-1642). Galileo -- astronomer, mathematician and physicist -- dwelt, not on examples coding the useless question, why do things happen? but, how do things happen? Gilbert, William (1544-1603) Gilbert is weakness of qualitative, famous for is less likely for a firm responsive?, his original studies in weakness of qualitative research, magnetism. He passionately rejected both the to keep healthy, prevailing Aristotelian philosophy and weakness research the Scholastic method of university teaching. Examples Of Medical. (See Aquinas.) Gilbert was one of the originators of the term 'electricity.' Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von (1749-1832). Though a philosopher, Goethe was a scientist carrying out work in biology and in optics.
Goethe looked at things in weakness, a different manner, different than those thinkers up to his time; he always attempted to euthanasia, see the individual phenomenon as part of an organic, developing whole . Gould, Stephen Jay (1941-2002) Of course, one should read Prof. Gould's works, as follows: Ever Since Darwin (1973) , The Panda's Thumb (1980), Hen's Teeth and weakness of qualitative Horse's Toes (1983), The Flamingo's Smile (1985), Wonderful Life , and An Urchin in free hunters, the Storm (1987). Gould's publisher is Norton of weakness of qualitative New York. As will come as no surprise, Gould's discipline was biology. Which Of The Following Pressure Firm To Be Locally Responsive?. (Click on letter to go to weakness, index.) (Click on letter to ways to keep, go to research, index.) (Click on purple banned letter to weakness, go to index.) (Click on letter to go to index.) (Click on which following to add responsive? letter to go to research, index.) (Click on andrew carnegie letter to weakness, go to index.) (Click on letter to andrew wealth, go to index.) -N- Newton, Sir Isaac (1642-1727). Newton was a mathematician and natural philosopher (physicist). Newton's principle achievement was that he went beyond the theoretical; he did experimental work. Though he built on the work of Copernicus, Kepler, and weakness of qualitative research Galileo; it is to Newton to whom we point as the person primarily responsible for examples coding, the mechanistic theory which accounts for the perceivable universe. (Click on letter to go to index.) (Click on of qualitative letter to andrew carnegie, go to index.) (Click on letter to go to index.) (Click on letter to research, go to examples of medical coding, index.) (Click on weakness research letter to go to free hunters, index.) (Click on of qualitative research letter to famine cause, go to weakness of qualitative research, index.) -T- Teller, Edward (1908- ): Hungarian born physicist, who studied under Niels Bohr at Copenhagen. Roman Catholic Orthodox Church Essay. Leaving Germany in 1933, Teller was to weakness of qualitative, lecture both at famine, London and at of qualitative, Washington (1935). Free Hunters. During the war years he was to weakness of qualitative research, join Oppenheimer's theoretical study group at Berkeley, California.
Teller was instrumental in Roman Church, the development of the of qualitative research, first earthbound thermonuclear explosion. He repudiated, as a scientist, any moral implications of his work, indeed, it is reported ( Chambers ) that he thought that but for Oppenheimer's qualms, the United Sates might of had the hydrogen bomb by 1947. Torricelli, Evangelista (1608-47): Italian scientist who was to become a helper (amanuensis) to Galileo. Upon Galileo' death, in 1642, Torricelli was to which of the following to add pressure for a, take a position at of qualitative research, the Florentine Academy. We will always know him for the invention of the Torricellian tube. Roman Essay. It was on account of Torricelli's experiments that we were to come to better under stand the nature of atmospheric pressure, for weakness, example, it was Torricelli who first determined that water will not rise above 33 feet in a suction pump. So, too, it is to Torricelli that we owe the first statement of the principles of hydro mechanics. His efforts also led to considerable improvements to Roman Catholic Orthodox, both the telescope and microscope. First and foremost, however, Torricelli was a mathematician and he is research, credited with several mathematical discoveries. Tyndall, John (1820-93): Tyndall is of the is less to add pressure firm to be locally responsive?, tagged as an English physicist, lecturer and research writer.
He collaborated with T. H. Huxley in certain of his scientific studies. A classic, is ways to keep healthy, Tyndall's book, Fragments of Science . I am fortunate, in addition, to have, in my library, Tyndall's Six Lectures on Light (London: Longmans, Green; 1885).
Write My Paper - Strengths and Weakness of The Qualitative…
Order Paper Writing Help 24/7 - An Analysis of the Strengths and Limitation of… pdf
Nov 17, 2017 Weakness of qualitative research,
Resume CV : PGT Computer Science Teacher/Lecturer. Email : m_asim_ali AT yahoo.com. asim.sultani AT gmail.com , asim.sultani AT rediffmail.com. Passport No : H2888429 Valid upto : 2019. A computer professional in weakness of qualitative a techno-educational capacity with a highly analytical and logical bent of mind, strong method orientation and work ethics adequately in tune with emerging IT industry's standard. Also having significant experience in purple banned acquainting common masses and school students up to XII level with the weakness research, latest as well as the prescribed curriculum of Computer Science.
A firm believer in team work, a team player with dedicated work, innovative and unique ideas, fair for andrew carnegie wealth communication and conceptualization and ability to interact with others at all levels. 1. B.Sc. (Physics, Chemistry and weakness of qualitative research, Maths) from Rohilkhand University. 1. Roman Vs Eastern Orthodox Church Essay? DCA (Diploma in Computer Applications) from Awadh Computer Institute under Ministry of weakness of qualitative, Human Resource and Development Govt. of India. 2. Roman Vs Eastern Church? PGDCA (Post Graduate Diploma in Computer Applications) from Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar. 3. M.Sc. Of Qualitative? (I.T.) from why was the color banned Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar. 1. ASHOK HALL GIRLS RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL, MAJKHALI, RANIKHET ALMORA- 2006 – Till Date. (An ISO 9002 certified and ICSE Board Affiliated Sr. Research? Sec. Girls School) (Owned by : Birla Education Society) Joined on 22 August 2006 and Working as PGT Computer Science Teacher responsibilities include imparting computer education to 10+2 level.
2. MANAS STHALI PUBLIC SCHOOL, BAREILLY- 1998 - 2006. ( A Co-ED. Why Was The Color Purple Banned? Sr. Research? Sec. Fully Residential Public School) (8 YEARS) Worked as PGT Computer Science (HOD Comp. Euthanasia? Deptt.) responsibilities include overall administration, imparting computer education to 10+2 level, imbibing new skills in the students, maintaining the weakness of qualitative research, computer lab and automating the which of the following to add for a to be responsive?, office work. Also looked after Hostel as a House Master for 2 years.
3. SOPHIA HIGH SCHOOL, Mt. ABU (Rajasthan) 1994-1998. (An ICSE Residential School) (4 YEARS) Independently handled the CLASS Project related to computer Literacy and of qualitative, awareness. Church Essay? Responsibilities include imparting computer education, maintaining the computer lab and automation the office work. 4. AWADH COMPUTER INSTITUTE, LUCKNOW 1992-1994 1992 - 1994. Worked as an weakness Assistant programmer cum Instructor in Orthodox Church Essay AWADH COMPUTER INSTITUTE at of qualitative, LUCKNOW (U.P.), responsibilities include developing software modules for various projects in COBOL and euthanasia, dBase III and IV plus etc. 1. Appointed as a Head Examiner in Computer Science (083) by CBSE Board Allahabad in weakness 2006. 2. Appointed as an External Examiner for practical examination and Evaluation of Catholic vs Eastern, answers scripts by CBSE Board Allahabad since 2002.
3. Worked in Examination Department of the school as a Examination Incharge. Operating system : MS-DOS 6.2, LINUX, WINDOWS (all versions) Language : C, C++, VISUAL BASIC, COBOL. DBMS/RDBMS : ORACLE, MS-ACCESS, MS-SQL, FOXPRO, Dbase IV+ Packages : MS-OFFICE 2000 and XP, PAGE MAKER 6.5, Web Tools : HTML, XML, CORE JAVA, ASP, JAVA Scripts and other Multimedia Tools. PAYROLL, LIBRARY INFORMATION SYSTEM, SCHOOL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ETC. Father's Name : (Late) Mr.
SHAUKAT ALI. S.O. (Retd.), Central Defense Account (CDA), Lucknow. Children : One Son studying in weakness VIII Std. and euthanasia, one Daughter studying in III std. Leisure Interests : Listening Music, Traveling, Counseling, Photography etc. Primary Assets : Conscientious, meticulous, hard working, enthusiastic, Disciplined and Highly adaptable to any situation. Successful in building friendly relationship with co-workers. Ashok Hall Girls’ Residential School.
(An Institution of of qualitative, Birla Group) MANAS STHALI PUBLIC SCHOOL, BAREILLY. Kind Attn Please : My wife is also a PRT teacher and the color purple, capable of teaching Ev.St. and Hindi upto classes VI. Re: Resume CV : PGT Computer Science Teacher/Lecturer. , Single,25 years, 27th November, 1985. c/o Bidyut kr Kahali. B2-249/4,M.A.M.C.
Township, Durgapur -713210. Email : baishali.envsc AT gmail.com. Qualifying Degree Year of Passing Division / Grade University/Board % of Marks Institute. M. Sc. (Environmental Science) 2009 I The University of Burdwan, West Bengal 77.41 The University of weakness of qualitative research, Burdwan, West Bengal. B.Ed 2010-11(pursuing) NA The University of potato famine, Burdwan, West Bengal NA Vidyasagar Institute,Tamna,Purulia. B.Sc. (Hons.) in weakness Zoology 2007. I The University of Burdwan, West Bengal 61.25 Raniganj Girls College, Burdwan. Higher Secondary (10+ 2) 2004. II West Bengal Council of Higher Secondary Education 57.2 Bidhan Chandra Institution For Girls. Madhyamik (10) 2002.
I I.C.S.E 77.5 Carmel Convent High School,Durgapur. Read Write Speak. English Yes Yes Yes. Hindi Yes Yes Yes. Bengali Yes Yes Yes. Reading Story books, Music. Place- (BAISHALI KAHALI) Re: Resume CV : PGT Computer Science Teacher/Lecturer. To train the students with advanced resources and tools of Computer Skills and the color banned, update myself as well that way.
3.Worked in of qualitative K.V.No.1(Army) Jodhpur as a Computer Instructor,Taught VI – XII in 2009-10. Clear in Concepts, Excellent Communication Skills, Extreme fluency in English, Calm, Confident, Cooperative, Social, Practical, Understanding and Honest in my work. Languages : VB, C, C++, RPG-IV, HTML,SQL,RPG/400,Java. OS : DOS, Microsoft Windows, Linux. Database : Foxpro , Oracle, DB2. Packages : MS Office, DTP. 1 M.Sc (CS) PLV College,Jodhpur MDS University,Ajmer 2007 67% I. 4 AISSE K.V.Fatehgarh CBSE 1998 64% I. 1. Examples Of Medical? I have been working in All India Radio Stn, Jodhpur as a Compere and Announcer for 2. Years during my PG. 2. Weakness? Won State Award in Scouts Guides during Sr.
Secondary. 3. Winner of examples of medical, UNESCO General Knowledge Award with 98% score while schooling in KV. 4. Recipient of of qualitative research, I prizes at the district level, College and University levels in various co curricular activities. 5. Been awarded I Prize by the Education Minister of UP at andrew carnegie wealth, University level Poetry. Composition Contest in year 2003 that was conducted in Allahabad University for one of. my Hindi Compositions. 6. Recipient of ‘Best Composition Award’ by a Cultural Organization for Women named. “ Sambhawana”, in Jodhpur at University level for one of my Hindi Compositions. E-mail : shahbaz83m AT yahoo.com. “APPLYING FOR THE SUBJECT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE” 1 year work experience in Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chirimiri as Computer Instructor in the session 2010-11.
2 months teaching experience in Innovation Academy, Chirimiri in the session 2009-10. 4 months teaching experience in weakness Regional Institute of andrew carnegie, Management Technology, Jabalpur in the session 2009-10. organization and to weakness keep adding value to andrew wealth my professional and personal skills. - Able to teach in both English Hindi medium. - Able to teach CBSE pattern. - Excellent communication and interpersonal skills. - Flexible and versatile to weakness research adapt to any new environment and work on any project.
- Master of Computer Application (MCA) : 2008. o Secured First Class with a percentage of 66.27% from potato Shri Ram Institute of weakness of qualitative, Tech. In Uk? Jabalpur affiliated to RGPV BHOPAL (MP). - Bachelor of Computer Application (BCA) : 2005. o Secured First Class with a percentage of weakness, 63.37% from RIMT affiliated to RDVV JABALPUR (MP). - Intermediate Education (Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry) : 2001.
o Secured Second Class with a percentage of 48.88% from Little Flowers’ Academy, MP Board of Intermediate Education. - School of Secondary Education (SSC) : 1999. o Secured Second Class with a percentage of 57.8% from Little Flowers’ Academy, MP Board of Secondary Education. - I have also done ASP.NET and C#.NET from “ORBIT IT CONSULTING PVT. LTD., HYDERABAD” JAN 2008. Platforms : WINDOWS XP/7.
Programming : HTML, C/C++, ASP.NET. Database : MSACCESS 2000, SQL 2000/05. 1. Project title (MCA VIth Sem.) : ONLINE-AUCTION SHOP. Language : Asp.net with SQL server. Duration : 4 months (Jan to the color purple Apr in weakness 2008) (This major project training is with NESTOR SOFTWARE PVT. LTD. 2. Project title (MCA Vth Sem.) : ONLINE EXAMINATION. Language : Asp.net with SQL server. Duration : 3 months (Aug to Oct in 2007) 3. Why Was The Color Banned? Project title (BCA VIth Sem.) : COMMISION MANAGEMENT.
Language : VB with MS Access. Duration : 4 months (Jan to Apr in 2005) - I have participated in Annual school level Exhibition. - I have participated in Annual school level Sports. - I have participated in many school level Quiz Competitions. CV for PGT teacher - Computer Science. Email : saxenarolii26784 AT gmail.com. Job Profile : Lecturer – Computer Science. Work Experience : More than 4.5 years of of qualitative research, experience as a Multi-Skilled Trainer/PGT Computer Science Faculty member with specialization in Oracle Developer Technologies (SQL, PL/SQL), C,C++ Data Structures, Digital Electronics,Java(NetBeans). - Assistant Teacher (Computer Science Deptt.) Goodley Public School,New Delhi (Affiliated to CBSE.)
Duration : April 2010 to Sept 2011. - Responsible for Church Orthodox Church taking computer classes at secondary and of qualitative, senior secondary level(VIII – XII). - Class Teacher of XI standard. - Specialized in C,C++, Data Structures, RDBMS, Computer Architecture,Java, NetBeans. - Co-ordination of various computer activities/competitions at intra-school and inter school level like “Computer Fest” at intra school level and “Edge” at inter school level.
- Grooming students on various softwares like Photoshop,DreamWeaver,Macromedia Flash,MS-FrontPage,Adobe Illustrator etc. - Lecturer (Computer Science Deptt.) National Degree College, Lucknow (Affiliated to Lucknow University) Duration : Aug 2008 to May 2009. - Conducting the Classes of BCA. - Specialized in purple C, Data Structures, RDBMS, C, Computer Architecture. - Co-ordination of weakness research, BCA Classes. - Systems Officer(Computer Science Deptt.) Duration : Feb 2006 to Aug 2008. - Responsible for examples of medical the proper conduct of BCA classes (Affiliated to Integral University, Lko) - Teaching the weakness research, classes of banned, C, Data Structures, DBMS, Computer Architecture. - Co-ordination of O-Level Batches at Centre Level.
- As a Examination In-charge, Responsible for of qualitative research conduct of euthanasia in uk, all the Exams at weakness research, Centre Level. - Conducting OCP Certification Batches on euthanasia in uk, Developer Track. - Managing Users on weakness, the Oracle Server. - Worked as Free Lance Oracle Trainer. Companies Served includes UPTEC Noida, NIIT Lko. Prominent Trainings Conducted : o Client : UPPCL, Lucknow. o Client : GITI, Lucknow. o Client : UPTEC Computer Consultancy Ltd. o Client : GITI, Lucknow. - Hotel Management System.
Software Used : Visual Fox Pro 6.0. - Travel Agency Management System. Front-end :Java Netbean. - Online Book Store and E-shopping System. - MCA from Punjab Technical University,2010. - Master of Science – I.T. (M.Sc. I.T.) from examples Punjab Technical University, 2008. - Bachelor of of qualitative, Arts from Lucknow University, 2005. - Intermediate (10+2) from famine cause I.S.C Board, 2001. Professional Training / Certifications : - Oracle Certified Associate (OCA) in of qualitative Oracle 9i Developer Track.
- DOEACC’s A-Level Diploma in Computers (2 years) – Equivalent to examples coding PGDCA. - DOEACC’s O-Level Diploma in Computers (1 year) I have supported or developed applications using the following tools: Oracle Database 9i, 10g; PL/SQL; SQL; Oracle 9i/ 10g Developer Suite (Forms Developer), MS-Office 2003, MS-Office 2007, C-Language, C++,Java(NetBeans). Proficiency in softwares: Photoshop,DreamWeaver,Macromedia Flash,MS-FrontPage,Adobe Illustrator etc. Also, I have good analytical, problem solving and communication skills. Email :bansal.gitika AT gmail.com. To make a distinctive contribution in the broad functional area and weakness, services in famine cause a challenging assignment. - MCA from of qualitative IGNOU(awarded the University Gold Medal) in andrew carnegie wealth 2010. - ‘O’ ‘A’ Level from DOEACC.
- Fluent in Spoken Written English Hindi. - Working as Computer Science Teacher ( PGT) with AVB Public School, Patparganj Delhi since April 2011. - Worked as Maths and Computer teacher with St. Weakness? Paul’s Girls Public School from potato famine cause July 2000 to April 2001. - Worked as Counsellor cum Computer faculty with Software Technology Group International Ltd.(STG) from May 2001 to weakness of qualitative research May 2002. - Worked as Maths, Science English teacher with Army Middle School from July 2002 to October 2004. Email : - mahesh.karpenter AT gmail.com. OBJECTIVE : To seek a challenging position in potato famine an Organization so that my skills can greatly enhance success of the weakness, Organization and also my professional growth. - Master Of Computer Application (MCA) with 68% from potato famine Prestige Institute of weakness of qualitative, Management Dewas (M.P) Approved by RGPV (Bhopal) (2006-2009) - PGDCA with 70%From ALMA Institute Dewas (2005-2006) - Bachelor of which of the likely pressure firm locally responsive?, Science (Bsc) with 61% From Vikram University Ujjain (2004) - Higher Secondary with 60.2% From BHS Sonkatch (2001) COMPUTER PROFICIENCY/SKILL SET : - Platforms : MS Windows 2000,XP.
- Programming Languages : C, C++,VB6.0,VB.Net,C#.Net,Asp.Net. - Back Hand Support : SQL Server2000,2005, MS Access. - Basic Hardware and Networking. - Organization : LISM (Indore) - Duration : Six Month. - Designation : Software Developer. - Job Responsibility : Was responsible for of qualitative research Software Analysis, Design, Coding, and Testing. - Organization : Govt. College Hatpipliya (Dewas) - Duration : One Year (20-06-2009 To 20-05-2010) - Designation : Asst.
Professor. - Organization : Kendriya Vidyalaya No. 1 Shift II (Indore) - Duration : One Year. - Designation : Computer Instructor (23-06-2010 To 28-02-2011) CURRENT WORKING : Kendriya Vidyalaya Bank Note Press Dewas. Designation : PGT. Computer Science. 1. Project Title : lismindia.com (Multilevel Network Business) Job Responsibility : Analysis, Design, Coding, and banned, Software. Description : lismindia.com works on the principle of Multilevel. Network Business it’s provide online services to of qualitative the.
Technology used : Asp.Net with VB.Net and SqlServer 2000. 2. Project Title : Lekot.com (Garments ) Job Responsibility : Analysis, Design,Coding, and Software. Description : lekot.com is a system used to provide online. Information of Garments for the Customer. It is.
Provide Information of Vendors and Franchises. Technology used : Asp.Net with VB.Net and SqlServer 2000. 3. Project Title : Birth Day Remainder System. Job Responsibility : Analysis, Design, Coding, and Software Modification. Description : It is the color purple banned Provide all the weakness research, information of user and Show the. B’Day and Catholic Church Church, Marriage Anniversary Date whenever any. Person having B’Day or Anniversary As well as It is.
Provide Email Facility for sending message to the. Technology used : C#.Net and SqlServer 2005. 4 Project Title : Hotel Bill Management System. Job Responsibility : Analysis, Design, Coding, and Software Modification. Description : It’s Provide Billing System and Item list for the. Technology used : VB.6.0 and MS Access. CURRICULUM VITAE FOR LECTURER/COMPUTER FACULTY/ COMPUTER TEACHER. E-mail : mailme.saumya AT rediffmail.com , saumyakrishna23april AT yahoo.co.in.
Current Project : “Teleradiotherapy Network Project” Current Status : Working as Telemedicine Technician. In Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Medical University, Lucknow. Responsibilities in the. current project : -Manages Software of the computer.
-Executing lectures through video conferencing. -Manages database maintenance. -Operates on the latest softwares like Online Telemed, Sanjeevani, Conferencing softwares, etc. Experience : 4 years 1 month. Course Name University Year Percentage Division.
MCA IGNOU 2007 72.27% I. BCA IGNOU 2005 72.25% I. Standard Board Year Percentage Division. High School U.P. Board 2000 64.66% I. Intermediate U.P. Weakness Of Qualitative? Board 2002 68.60% I. (in English Sociology) Lucknow University 2006 66.55% I. Operating System : MS-DOS, Windows. Languages : C, C++, Java, VB 6.0, SQL. Database : MS-Access, Oracle 8. 1. The Color? HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - BCA.
2. STUDENT INFORMATION SYSTEM - MCA. 3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM - MCA. [Projects developed on Vb6.0 as front end and SQL, Oracle as back end] Strength : Self-motivated, Positive, Perseverance and Learning. Keen Interest : Administration, Teaching, Project Leader, Project Incharge. Languages Known : Hindi, English. your profile has been shortlisted.we have opening for computer teacher in jain nagar.if u r interested,mail us ur c.v.My email id is weakness of qualitative pcjaintraders AT yahoo.com . plz tell me whats ur expected CTC. Email : kumarnagender09 AT gmail.com.
Highly enthusiastic and possess excellent analysis and problem solving skills. Eleven months of experience in the Software industry. Have always delivered results on time. Have a penchant for learning and possess good communication skills. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE-MORE THEN 1 YEAR.
Environment :Titanium/Mac osx,web services. Description :California Angler is Fishing Guide Services to share his experience and expert fishing knowledge. Of Medical Coding? This project base on web services. Environment :Xcode/Mac osx,objective-C. Environment :Titanium/Mac osx,web services and android.
Description : This Application is for presenting Medical Product. - Global Farming And Consultancy. Environment : Windows,ASP.NET 3.5 and 4.0 with c#, SQL SERVER 2005. Description : This Project basically a Web Based in weakness research this when user can enter in this site they get all the of medical coding, Information related to the farming and by weakness sign up the user can purchase the Roman Catholic Church vs Eastern Essay, product that is seeds Fertilizer Pesticide etc. and after transection they give the feedback .The user also upload the his product and research, sell the product on which is less to the locally, web . The web also having the admin section the admin can maintain the records. MCA 2011 from weakness of qualitative UPTU University, Moradabad. Bsc 2008 from Rohailkhand University, Amroha. Oracle 9i Two months certification from the college campus..
E-mail : pandu.priyadarshani AT gmail.com. BRANCH : INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Seeking a growth oriented academic position where I can contribute to potato the overall growth of the organization, utilizing my knowledge and technical skill in the field of research, Software. Operating System : MS DOS, Win 98, 2000, XP. Programming Language : C, C++, JAVA, DBMS. Special Skill : TOMCAT, WEB LOGIC. - Good Communication and Interpersonal skills. - Ability to fathom the andrew carnegie wealth, intricacies of any professional subject. - Good team co-ordination. - Capability of weakness of qualitative, executing challenging assignments with right blend of intelligence, patience within the examples coding, time frame. - Ability to learn fast.
- Comprehensive problem solving capability. Now I am doing PG DIPLOMA IN INFORMATION SECURITY in research IGNOU,DELHI. Father’s Name : Purna Chandra Barik. Husband’s Name : Jayshankar Pandu. Date of Birth : 19th August 1985. Marital Status : Married. Language Proficiency : English, Hindi Oriya. Hobbies : Listening to Music, Reading Books.
- Stood 1st in debate competition. I hereby declare that all the information furnished by me is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date : Signature of Applicant. Email : sophiya.sheikh AT gmail.com. To fulfill my duties to the best of my abilities.
Technology : ASP.Net 3.5 with C#, DotNetNuke, JQuery. Operating Systems : MS-DOS 6.2, Windows '95, '98, Windows 2000, Windows 7. Application Packages : MSOffice 97, 2000, XP. Database Systems : MS-SQL 2005, Oracle 10G, MS-SQL 2008. M.C.A. with 83% from Ajmer Institute of examples coding, Technology, Ajmer affiliated from Rajasthan Technical University, Kota in of qualitative 2010. B.Sc. Euthanasia In Uk? (Information Technology) with 75.48% from Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati University, Ajmer in weakness research 2007. Intermediate (Phy., Chem., Bio.) with 70.92% from Rajasthan Board in 2004. Matriculation with 70.67% from Rajasthan Board in 2002. Pearl Education Society.
Worked on emailer module. Tools using Dotnetnuke framework 5.6, VB.net SQL SERVER 2005, HTML. Description : This site runs on intranet of WNS organization which provides information to weakness research the employees about the carnegie, organization. Role Responsibilities Worked as Developer in maintenance phase. Worked on modules creation (Holiday calendar, Ask from research leader, Yellow Pages, Messaging board, Announcement and highlight). Project Title : Inventory Management System (Advanced Java) It is software, for managing inventory. Father’s Name Mohmmed Umar Sheikh. Date of following to add pressure to be locally responsive?, Birth 08-08-1987.
Languages Known English and Hindi. Marital Status Single. Copyright 2017 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. Weakness Research? All rights reserved.
Essay Writing Service - An Analysis of the Strengths and Limitation of… pdf
Nov 17, 2017 Weakness of qualitative research,
Amazon reworking rules for product reviews. The online retail giant acknowledged that it is rethinking the way the of qualitative research, review system works, with a spokesman saying it is examining its “policies regarding activism reviews.” Amazon.com is revising its product review system six weeks after The Seattle Times reported on activists posting reviews to push their political and social agendas. “We are taking a close look at our policies regarding activism reviews and are considering changes,” Amazon spokesman Tom Cook said in a statement. The Times article reported on coordinated attacks by Amazon reviewers on Scarlett Lewis, the mother of a 6-year-old boy murdered at Sandy Hook Elementary School in why was the color banned, Connecticut three years ago Monday. Lewis wrote “Nurturing Healing Love: A Mother’s Journey of Hope and of qualitative research, Forgiveness” to of medical coding, describe her journey after the weakness, massacre. Dozens of reviewers — conspiracy theorists who believe the shootings were an Obama administration hoax to push for gun-control legislation — savaged Lewis on the Amazon book Web page as a liar and opportunist. Lewis, among others, called on Amazon to why was, remove the weakness of qualitative research, reviews. Amazon has removed some of the potato, most malicious ones. Weakness Research? Gone is a postwritten Oct. 16 by “Kenny,” who called Lewis “a real sick human being.” Another no longer there is from which following is less pressure for a to be “David Weiss,” who branded Lewis “a lying traitor.” Amazon declined to disclose details of the review system. So it’s unclear whether they would prevent attacks like those on Lewis. One change the company has already made is the removal of of qualitative, its “General Review Creation Guidelines” Web page.
Those rules barred reviews with “profanity or spiteful remarks,” as well as “advertisements, promotional material or repeated posts that make the same point excessively.” That page was taken down this week. Instead, the company redirects Web traffic to its “Customer Review Creation Guidelines.” Those rules are a bit more vague. Amazon, for andrew carnegie wealth, example, prohibits “Hate Speech #038; Offensive Content” without any mention of spiteful comments. That could allow Amazon some leeway in determining what’s suitable for its website. But even as the company has scrubbed the of qualitative research, particularly callous comments regarding Lewis, still remaining are dozens calling the Sandy Hook massacre a hoax. Examples Of Medical Coding? “Complete and utter bullcrap,” a reviewer who goes by “Airborne Media” wrote about Lewis’ book in a Nov. 8 post that remained on the site Tuesday afternoon. Reviewer “ThisIsWhatsGoingOn” posted on Nov.
3 that “Sandy Hook NEVER happened!!” Apparently, reviews buying into the conspiracy theory that the murders were staged don’t meet Amazon’s offensive-content standard. Of Qualitative? And the famine, current guidelines say nothing about repetitive posts, except to of qualitative, prohibit using “other people’s material (including excessive quoting).” That would seem to allow activism campaigns, such as the effort last year by the Rainforest Action Network and why was the color banned, SumOfUs to target a new soda, Pepsi True. The two groups have condemned PepsiCo for its use of so-called “conflict palm oil,” the weakness of qualitative, harvesting of which is causing deforestation, in its Doritos and other snack products. So they teamed up to coding, encourage their Facebook and Twitter followers to post negative reviews of Pepsi True, and nearly 4,000 obliged. Amazon’s biggest challenge is figuring out the best way to discover violations of its reviews guidelines. It’s hardly a trivial task. Amazon doesn’t disclose the weakness, number of products it lists for sale, but a survey conducted by the investment firm Robert W. Baird #038; Co. in July estimated the company listed about 365 million items at the time.
That’s far too many for why was banned, humans to police, particularly for a company that prefers to automate as many business processes as possible. So Amazon has largely relied on algorithms to catch the worst offenders of its guidelines. Of Qualitative Research? But that didn’t prevent people from targeting Scarlett Lewis. The Amazon staff that took down the coding, most malicious reviews targeting Lewis cannot move fast enough. On Tuesday afternoon, customers could find a Nov.
15 review by “Jeremy B. Bowers” that describes the book as being “Full of lies and fictional fantasies of research, a get rich quick Millionaire parent capitalizing on her child’s death to potato famine cause, make another million.” Another, written by “Nannoshi” on Nov. 5, reads, “Stand up Lewis and admit the treason.” Moreover, Lewis isn’t the weakness research, only Sandy Hook author who’s been attacked. Euthanasia In Uk? In videos posted on YouTube, conspiracy theorists have also called on followers to trash “Choosing Hope: Moving Forward from Life’s Darkest Hours” by Sandy Hook Elementary first-grade teacher Kaitlin Roig-DeBellis. In an Oct. 16 post, a reviewer named “Sarah” wrote on the book’s Amazon page, “This women (sic) is a traitor to humanity to publish this kind of trash for money.”
One way to quiet the coordinated campaign would be to restrict reviews to customers who’ve actually purchased products on Amazon. Most of the activists are unlikely to research, buy the vs Eastern Church Essay, products they are criticizing. But that limit would force the company to walk away from a valuable asset — detailed shopping interests of customers, both on Amazon.com and beyond. Research? A tiny fraction of the reviews on Amazon are posted by activists and conspiracy theorists. Most are written by well-intentioned shoppers who want to share their insight with other consumers. But Amazon also collects their viewing habits, and banned, they feed Amazon’s recommendation algorithms to suggest other purchases. Limiting reviews only to of qualitative research, purchases made on Amazon would rob the andrew wealth, company of valuable data. Moreover, the simple act of writing reviews brings customers to Amazon’s site who might not otherwise have come. That creates an opportunity to sell them something. And Amazon reviewers, some of whom have posted thousands or reviews, have their own community.
Amazon ranks them by the “most helpful” reviews, and even has a “Hall of Fame” for the best contributors. “Amazon doesn’t want to shoot the goose laying the golden egg,” said Trevor Pinch, a Cornell University science and technology professor who has studied Amazon’s review system. “Amazon is hoping these issues will go away, and by tinkering with (the reviews system), it will address the issues without having to weakness of qualitative, make big changes.” The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and euthanasia, do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.
Custom Essay Writing Service - Advantages and Disadvantages of Qualitative Research…
Nov 17, 2017 Weakness of qualitative research,
Essay on of qualitative, Oligopoly: Top 8 Essays on Oligopoly | Markets | Microeconomics. Here is following is less likely for a firm locally responsive? a compilation of essays on ‘Oligopoly’ for weakness class 9, 10, 11 and 12. Find paragraphs, long and short essays on euthanasia, ‘Oligopoly’ especially written for school and college students. Essay on the Introduction to Oligopoly Essay on the Characteristics of Oligopoly Essay on weakness, the Scope of Study of Oligopoly Essay on the Models of Oligopoly Essay on in uk, the Sales (Revenue) Maximisation Essay on the Constrained Revenue Maximisation Essay on Game Theory Essay on Payoff (Profit) Matrix. Essay # 1. Introduction to Oligopoly: Two extreme market forms are monopoly (characterised by the existence of a single seller) and perfect competition (characterised by weakness of qualitative research a large number of sellers).
Competition is of two types- perfect competition and monopolistic competition. In perfect competition, all sellers sell homogeneous products while in monopolistic competition they sell heterogeneous products. In monopoly there is no rival. So the monopolist is not concerned with the effect of his actions on rivals. In both types of competition, the number of firms is so large that the actions of potato famine cause any one seller have little, if any, effect on its competitors. An industry with only a few sellers is known as an weakness, oligopoly, a firm in such an industry is known as an oligopolist. Although car-wash is a million rupee business, it is cause not exactly a product familiar to most consumers. However, often many familiar goods and services are supplied only by a few competing sellers, which means the industries we are talking about are oligopolies.
An oligopoly is not necessarily made up of large firms. When a village has only two medicine shops, service there is just as much an oligopoly as air shuttle service between Mumbai and Pune. Essentially, oligopoly is the result of the same factors that sometimes produce monopoly, but in somewhat weaker form. Honestly, the most important source of oligopoly is the weakness research existence of economies of scale, which give better producers a cost advantage over smaller ones. When these economies of which of the following is less pressure to be scale are very strong, they lead to monopoly, but when they are not that strong they lead to competition among a small number of weakness of qualitative firms. Since an Catholic Church Orthodox, oligopoly contains a small number of firms, any change in the firms’ price or output influences the sales and profits of of qualitative competitors.
Each firm must, therefore, recognise that changes in its own policies are likely to elicit changes in the policies of its competitors as well. As a result of this interdependence, oligopolists face a situation in which the optimal decision of one firm depends on what other firms decide to in uk do. And so there is opportunity for weakness research both conflict and cooperation. Oligopoly refers to a market situation in andrew which the weakness of qualitative research number of sellers is few, but greater than one. A special case of Roman Church Orthodox Church oligopoly is weakness of qualitative research monopoly in which there are only two sellers. Essay # 2. Characteristics of Oligopoly: The notable characteristics of oligopoly are: An oligopolist is neither a price-taker (like a competitor) nor a price-maker (like a monopolist).
It is a price-searcher. An oligopolist is neither a big enough part of the market to be able to act as a monopolist, nor a small enough part of the examples market to weakness of qualitative research be able to act as a competitor. But each firm is a dominant part of the market. In such a situation, competition among buyers will force all the sellers to charge a uniform price for a product. Potato? But each firm is sufficiently so large a part of the market that its actions will have noticeable effects upon weakness research his rivals. This means that if a single firm changes its output, the prices charged by all the firms will be raised or lowered. In oligopoly, there may be product differentiation as in examples of medical coding monopolistic competition (called differentiated oligopoly) or a homogeneous product may be traded by all the few dominant firms (as in pure oligopoly).
3. Interdependence and Uncertainty : In oligopoly no firm can take decision on price independently. It is of qualitative research because the decision to fix a new price or change an existing price will create reactions among the rival firms. But rivals’ reactions cannot be predicted accurately. Potato? If a firm reduces its price its rivals may reduce their prices or they may not. So there is lack of symmetry in the behaviour of rival firms.
This type of reaction of rivals is not found in perfect competition or monopolistic competition where all firms change their price in of qualitative the same direction and by the same magnitude in order to remain competitive and survive in wealth the long run. Weakness Of Qualitative? So the outcome of a firm’s decision is uncertain. For this reason it is difficult to predict the total demand for why was the color the product of an oligopolistic industry. It is still more difficult, and in some situations virtually impossible, to estimate the share of an individual firm in industry’s output. It is true that the of qualitative research consequences of attempted price variations on the part of an Church Church Essay, individual seller are uncertain. Weakness Research? His rivals may follow his change, or they may not, but they will, in all likelihood, notice it. The results of any action on the part of an oligopolist or even a duopolist depend upon the reactions of his rivals.
In short, it is vs Eastern Orthodox not possible to define general price- quantity relations for research an individual firm, since reaction patterns of Catholic Church rivals are highly uncertain and almost completely unknown. 4. Different Reaction Patterns and Use of of qualitative research Models : It is which of the following is less to add firm responsive? not true to say that, in oligopoly, profit is research always maximised. It is because an oligopolist does not have control over all the variables which affect his profit. Moreover, a variety of carnegie wealth possible reaction patterns is weakness of qualitative research possible in this market—there is a conjectural variation in this market. Just as firm A’s profit depends on the output of firm B also, firm B’s profit, in its turn, depends on firm A’s output. This is why various models are used to potato famine describe the diverse behaviour of weakness oligopoly markets where a variety of outcomes is possible. As in monopolistic competition there is not only price competition but non-price competition as well in oligopoly (and, to some extent, in duopoly). For example, advertising is often a life and death question in this type of market due to strategic behaviour of all firms.
In most oligopoly situations we find intermediate outcomes. Economists are yet to emerge with a definite behaviour pattern in oligopoly. Essay # 3. Purple Banned? Scope of Study of research Oligopoly : Here we study a few of the many possible reaction patterns in duopoly and famine oligopoly situations. The focus is on pure oligopoly. Here we assume that all firms produce a homogeneous product. We do not discuss the case of differentiated oligopoly and the issue of selling cost (advertising) separately. Of course, we discuss briefly Baumol’s sales maximisation hypothesis—without and with advertising. The focus here is on the interdependence of the various sellers’ reactions, which is the essential distinguishing feature of oligopoly.
If the influence of of qualitative one seller’s quantity decision from the in uk profit of another, ?? i /?q j , is negligible, the industry must be either perfectly competitive or monopolistically competitive. If ?? i /?q j , is perceptible, the industry is duopolistic or oligopolistic. The optimum quantity and maximum profit of a duopolist or oligopolist depend upon the actions of the firms belonging to the industry. He can control only his own output level (or price, if his product is differentiated), but he has no direct control over of qualitative research other variables which are likely to (or do) affect his profits. In truth, the profit of each oligopolist is the coding result of the interaction of the decisions of research all players in the market. Since there are no generally accepted behavioural assumptions for oligopolists and duopolists as is euthanasia in uk found in other market forms, there are diverse patterns of behaviour and many different solutions for oligopolistic and duopolistic markets. Each solution is based on different types of models and each model is based on weakness research, a different behavioural assumption or a set of assumptions. Here we start with one or two simple duopoly models.
The same analysis (solution) can be extended to cover any oligopolistic market. The earliest model of duopoly behaviour is the Cournot model, with which we may start our review of different oligopoly models. We end with the game theoretic treatment of oligopoly which shows decision-making under conflict. Essay # 4. Models of Oligopoly: The Cournot model (presented in 1838) is based on the analysis of cause a market in which two firms produce a homogeneous product.
Augustin Cournot (a French economist) noticed that only two firms were producing mineral water for sale. Of Qualitative Research? He argued that each firm would choose quantity that would maximise profit, taking the quantity marketed by its competitor as given. Two main features of the model are: (i) Each firm chooses a quantity of output instead of price; and. (ii) In choosing its output each firm takes its rival’s output as given. In Cournot’s model, then, strategies are quantities of output. Here we assume that firms produce a homogeneous good and know the market demand curve. Each firm must decide how much to in uk produce, and the two firms make their decisions at the same time. When taking its production decision, each duopolist takes into consideration its competitor. Weakness Of Qualitative Research? It knows that its competitor is also deciding how much to produce, and the market price will depend on the total output of examples coding both firms. The essence of the Cournot model is that each firm treats the research output level of its competitor as fixed and then decides how much to produce. Each Cournot’s duopolist believes that the other’s quantity will not change.
In Fig. Potato Famine Cause? 1 when I produces Q M , II maximises its profit by producing 1/4Q C . In order to weakness sell Q M plus Q c , the price must fall to P 1 . Here Q M is the monopoly output which is half the competitive output Q c . The inverse demand function, stating price as a function of the aggregate quantity sold, is expressed as: where q 1 and q 2 are the output levels of the duopolists. The total revenue of famine cause each duopolist depends upon his own output level as also as that of his rival: The profit of each equals his total (sales) revenue, less his cost, which depends upon his output level above: The basic behavioural assumption of the Cournot model is that each duopolist maximises his profit on of qualitative research, the assumption that the quantity produced by his rival is invariant with respect to his own decision regarding output quantity. Church Essay? Duopolist I maximises ? 1 with reference to q 1 , treating q 2 as a parameter, and duopolist II maximises ? 2 , with reference to q 2 , treating q 1 as a parameter. Setting the partial derivatives of (3) equal to zero, we get: The first order (necessary) condition of profit-maximisation requires that each duopolist equates his marginal cost to his marginal revenue. Weakness Of Qualitative? The second order (sufficient) condition of wealth each duopolist requires that. The slope of the marginal revenue curve of each duopolist must be less than that of the marginal cost curve.
Unlike the two-cost monopolist, where a single individual controls the value of both output levels, in the Cournot model each duopolist maximises his profit with reference to a single variable under his control. This simply implies that the marginal revenues of the duopolists are not necessarily the same. The marginal revenues of the duopolists are: Since the weakness of qualitative research demand curve is downward sloping the duopolist with the euthanasia in uk greater output will have the smaller marginal revenue (because a duopolist has to reduce price to sell more). The Cournot solution is weakness simple enough. In this model, the duopolist market is in equilibrium if the values of andrew carnegie wealth q 1 and q 2 are such that each duopolist maximises his profit, taking the output of the sole rival as a parameter, and neither desires to change his output level. Thus, there is no conjectural variation in this model.
The optimum solution (equilibrium condition) can be found out in of qualitative research this model by potato famine solving (3) for q 1 and q 2 if (4) is satisfied. At this stage we have to introduce an additional step to get a more complete picture of duopoly. Reaction functions which express the output of each duopolist as a function of his rival’s output are determined by solving the first equation of weakness (3) for q 1 and the second for q 2 : The reaction function of duopolist I gives a relationship between q 1 and q 2 with the property that, for why was the color purple banned any specified value of q 2 , the corresponding value of q 1 maximises p 1 . In a like manner, duopolist II’s reaction function gives the value of q 2 which maximises p 2 for any specified value of q 1 . An equilibrium solution here is a pair of values for weakness of qualitative q 1 and q 2 which satisfy both reaction functions. Let us suppose the demand and cost functions of Catholic Orthodox Church duopolists are: All parameters are positive here.
So the profits of the duopolists are. The corresponding reaction functions are: Since the parameters B, b 1 q 1 and b 2 , q 2 are all positive, an increase in output of either duopolist will lead to a fall in the other optimum (profit-maximising) output. The reaction functions are linear as shown in Fig. 2. An equilibrium is found out by solving (7), or by the intersection point E of the two reaction curves (point E in research Fig. 2). The solution of (7) is. The second-order (sufficient) conditions are satisfied by the linear demand and the color purple banned quadratic cost functions:
The restrictions of the Cournot model lies in weakness research its basic behavioural assumption regarding the continuing belief that a firm’s only carnegie wealth, rival will always produce the quantity that is of qualitative currently being produced. Each duopolist acts on the basis of the assumption that his rival’s output remained fixed. Famine Cause? However, this need not necessarily be true. If we assume that equilibrium is weakness reached through a sequence of finite adjustments, one duopolist sets an output; this induces the other to adjust his output, which, in turn, induces the first to adjust his, and so on. It is quite unlikely that “each will assume that his quantity decisions do not affect his rival’s quantity decision if each of his adjustments is potato immediately followed by a reaction on the part of his rival”. To be more specific, if equilibrium is of qualitative assumed to be reached simultaneously, the optimal quantity of a duopolist is not given by q 1 =f 1 (q 2 ), but by q 1 =f 1 [f 2 (q 1 )] and, similarly for II, since each knows the behaviour pattern of his rival. Alternatively stated, the Cournot model assumes that each duopolist maximises his profit at the assumption that his rival’s price remains constant. But this is not a very realistic assumption for purple a homogeneous product.
As a general rule, duopolists and weakness of qualitative oligopolists take into consideration their mutual interdependence while taking output decisions. The simple Cournot model can be extended to cover more than two firms. As the number of likely to add to the firm locally firms expands, industry output expands according to of qualitative the relation. where n denotes the number of firms. Clearly, as the number of firms increases, n/(n + 1) will approach one, and the industry output (Q) will approach the competitive level (Q c ). In general, we can write the duopolists’ profit functions as ? 1 (q 1 , q 2 ) = q 1 D (q 1 +q 2 ) – C (q 1 ) and ? 2 (q 1 , q 2 ) = q 2 D (q 1 + q 2 ) – C (q 2 ) where D is the andrew wealth demand for, and C is the cost function. The first firm chooses a quantity q 1 , where the research partial derivatives of ?, with functions to wealth q 1 is equal to zero: Of course, this is an implicit expression for the first firm’s best-response function because it determines the weakness of qualitative profit-maximising quantity of the Catholic Church vs Eastern Orthodox Church Essay first firm (q 1 ) for any value of of qualitative q 2 . Famine? Similarly, the second firm’s best response function is implicitly defined by.
The Cournot equation is weakness research then a pair of andrew wealth quantity q 1 C q 2 C that satisfies both the weakness of qualitative best-response functions. To operate a cartel successfully, the firms must learn to threaten to punish each other for cheating on the cartel agreement. Let us consider a duopoly consisting of two identical firms such that each firm produces just half the monopoly amount of Roman Church vs Eastern Orthodox Essay output where total profits will be maximised and research each firm will get a payoff of vs Eastern Orthodox Church ? p ( say). In order to research make this outcome stable, one firm threatens the other in terms of the in uk production of output such that if any one of them tries to cheat by producing more than the joint industry profit level of output, then it will be punished by the other firms, who will be producing at the Cournot level of output forever. This is weakness known as a punishment strategy.
Now we assume that cheating occurs, and the punishment is carried out. As the ultimate optimal response to Cournot behaviour is the Cournot behaviour, it will result in each firm receiving a per-period profit of, say ? c , such that. where ? c > Cournot payoff. We suppose that each of the two firms is producing at the collusive monopoly level of output. If a firm produces more output, deviating from its quota of production, the level of its profit is such that. and it is the standard temptation facing a cartel member.
Each firm has an incentive to capitalize on the high price by increasing its production, if each one restricts output and raises the price and for this there can be a punishment for cheating. Clearly, if a firm produces at the cartel amount, each one gets a steady flow of payments of why was purple ? p . Thus, the present value of this flow today can be given by: Present Value of cartel behaviour – ? p + ? p /r. The firm gets a one-time benefit of weakness profit, ? d , if it produces more than the cartel amount. This results is the reversion to carnegie Cournot behaviour: Here the of qualitative numerator of potato this fraction is positive, as the monopoly profits are larger than the Cournot profits, and the deviation is weakness of qualitative even more profitable than sticking with the monopoly quota which helps the denominator to be positive.
The inequality suggests that as long as the rate of interest is quite small, it will be profitable for the firms to adhere to their quotas, so that the Essay prospect of future punishment is sufficiently important. The Bertrand model was developed in weakness of qualitative 1883 by the French economist Joseph Bertrand. Like the Cournot model, it applies to firms that produce the same homogeneous good and make other decisions simultaneously. This change may affect market outcome dramatically. The Bertrand model substitutes price ? 1 and ? 2 for examples of medical quantities q 1 and q 2 as the of qualitative research variables to be chosen.
Thus, the Cournot and Bertrand equilibrium are logical first cousins. What is the Church Church Essay first firm’s demand function if it takes its rivals’ price p 2 as given? The first firm will anticipate that if it charges a price higher than its rivals’ (p 1 p 2 ), everyone will buy from its rival. If the first firm charges a lower price than its rivals’ (p 1 p 2 ), however, everyone will buy from it. And if it charges a price equal to weakness of qualitative its rivals’ (p 1 = p 2 ), the firms will divide the market among them. The diagram for this profit function is shown in Fig. 3. Here OM is the marginal cost of producing the commodity. The second firm’s price is coding p 2 . The first firm’s profit function is composed of three segments. When p 1 p 2 , the weakness first firm captures the of medical entire market, and its profit increases as its price increases.
When p 1 p 2 , the two firms split the total profits equal to weakness research distance CA, and each makes a profit equal to CB. When p 1 p 2 , the why was purple banned first firm’s profit is zero because it sells nothing when its price exceeds the second firm’s price. The Bertrand model has been criticised on two main grounds. Weakness Research? First, when firms produce a homogeneous good, it is more natural to compete by setting quantities rather than prices. Second, even if firms do set prices and choose the same price (as the in uk model predicts), what share of total sales will go to each one? The model assumes that sales would be divided equally among the firms, but there is no reason why this must be the case. However, despite these shortcomings, the weakness of qualitative Bertrand model is useful because it shows how the equilibrium outcome in an oligopoly can depend crucially on andrew wealth, the firms’ choice of strategic variable. The Stackelberg model (presented by weakness the German economist Heinrich von Stackelberg) is a modified version of the Cournot model.
In the Cournot model, we assume that two duopolists make their output decisions at the same time. The Stackelberg model examines what happens if one of the firms can set its output first. The Stackelberg model of duopoly is different from the Cournot model, in which neither firm has any opportunity to react. The model is cause based on the assumption that the profit of each duopolist is a function of the output levels of both: The Cournot solution is found out by maximising ? 1 with reference to weakness q 1 , assuming q 2 to be constant and likely to add for a locally responsive? ? 2 with reference to q 2 , assuming q 1 to be constant. Weakness Of Qualitative Research? In general, each firm might make some other assumption about the response (reaction) of its only rival. In such a situation, profit-maximisation by the two duopolists requires the euthanasia in uk fulfillment of the following two conditions:
The terms of ?q 2 /?q 1 and of qualitative ?q 1 /?q 2 represent what economists call the carnegie conjectural variation, i.e., the assumed response of each firm to the output of its lone rival. Weakness Research? If firms make wrong assumptions about each other’s responses, (2) will not represent an improvement over the Cournot model. The Stackelberg model contains one of the more interesting set of assumptions about conjectural variation based on andrew, the analysis of leadership and followership. Weakness Research? A follower obeys his reaction function q 1 =f 1 (q 2 ) or q 2 =f 2 (q 1 ) and adjusts his output level with a view to maximising his profits given the quantity decision of his rival, when he assumes to be a leader. But a leader does not obey his (the follower’s) reaction function. He simply assumes that his rival acts as a follower, and maximises his profit, given his rival’s reaction function.
If the first duopolist acts as a leader, he assumes his rival’s reaction function is valid and, therefore, substitutes this relation into his own profit function. The first duopolist’s profit is now a function of q 1 alone. So it can be maximised with respect to this single variable. The second duopolist can also determine the maximum profit from leadership on the assumption that the first one obeys his reaction function and acts as a follower. The first duopolist’s maximum profit from followership is determined by substituting his rival’s optimum leadership output level in his reaction function. Similarly, the examples of medical coding second duopolists’ maximum profit from followership is determined by substituting the research first duopolist’s optimum leadership output level in his reaction function. Andrew Carnegie Wealth? This kind of ‘first mover advantage’ occurs in many strategic situations. Each duopolist determines his maximum profit levels from both leadership and followership and seeks to play the role which yields the larger maximum.
Stackelberg thinks of four possible outcomes: (1)1 desires to be a leader and weakness research 2 a follower; (2) 2 desires to famine be a leader and 1 a follower; (3) both desire to be leaders; and. (4) both desire to be the followers. The first outcome results in weakness research a consistent behaviour pattern and, therefore, a determinate equilibrium (assuming that the first and euthanasia in uk second order conditions for maximum are fulfilled in weakness all cases). Similarly, the second outcome results in a determinate equilibrium. But if both desire to act as followers, their expectations are not fulfilled, since each assumes that the other will take the leadership role. Comparison with Cournot Model: Even in euthanasia in uk terms of the of qualitative research Stackelberg model, the which pressure for a firm responsive? Cournot solution is achieved if each desires to act as a follower, knowing fully well that the other will also take a follower’s role.
Otherwise, one has to change his behaviour pattern and act as a leader before attaining equilibrium. If both desire to act as leaders, each assumes that the other’s behaviour is governed by his reaction function, but, in fact, neither of the reaction functions is obeyed. Consequently, a Stackelberg disequilibrium situation is encountered, which, in Stackelberg’s view, is the most frequent outcome. However, if Stackleberg was correct, the situation will result in quantity market-sharing war, and equilibrium will not be achieved until one has succumbed to of qualitative the leadership of the other or a collusive agreement has been reached. However, by using this model, it is possible to show that each duopolist can receive a greater profit from leadership. Andrew Carnegie Wealth? So it is quite obvious that both desire to act as leaders. The Cournot and Stackleberg models are alternative representatives of oligopolistic behaviour.
Which model is the more appropriate depends on the industry. In an industry where all firms are more or less identical, none of which has a pricing advantage or leadership position, the of qualitative Cournot model is probably the more appropriate. On the Catholic Orthodox other hand, some industries are dominated by weakness research a large firm that usually takes the lead in introducing new products or setting price—the mainframe computer market is an example, with IBM as the leader. Then the Stackelberg model may be more realistic. Duopolists (or oligopolists) often recognise their mutual interdependence and agree to of medical coding act together (in collusion) in order to maximise the total profit of the industry. Collusive model of oligopoly shows what happens when oligopolists do decide to collude on a joint strategy. In such situations, both output levels are under a single control, and the industry is, in effect, a monopoly. Let us suppose we represent total revenue as. Total profit is.
This type of profit function is found in case of a two-plant monopolist. Here we substitute two plants by two producers. Weakness Of Qualitative? The first order condition of potato cause profit-maximisation requires that marginal cost of each producer be equated to marginal revenue for research output as a whole. In this model, the profit levels of Roman Catholic Church Essay two duopolists are determined as the basis of their individual profit functions. However, joint profit-maximisation or the final distribution of the aggregate profit is of qualitative research largely the matter for negotiation between the duopolists. Like the Catholic Orthodox Church Essay Cournot equilibrium, the of qualitative research Bertrand equilibrium is wealth individually rational, but collectively irrational. Again, firms of the Bertrand equilibrium have a clear incentive to collude. Does this mean that the collusive model makes better sense of oligopoly than do the Cournot and Bertrand models? Not necessarily.
On the one hand, if firms find themselves at weakness of qualitative, a Cournot or a Bertrand equilibrium, they have a clear incentive to collude. On the other hand, if firms manage to force a collusive agreement, there is a clear private incentive for each party to cheat on the collusive agreement. In the Cournot model, the wealth individual incentive to weakness cheat on a collusive agreement increases as the examples of medical coding number of parties to the agreement increases, which means that the weakness of qualitative larger the number of of the following is less to add to be locally responsive? firms in an industry, the less likely is a collusive equilibrium. Weakness Of Qualitative? If the number of firms is large enough, some firm or firms will succumb to the temptation to cheat, thereby destroying the collusive agreement. The Market-sharing Solution : Some economists have analysed the potato famine nature of oligopolistic interdependence in case of differentiated products. In truth, product differentiation is likely to occur with duopoly and oligopoly as with monopolistic competition. If duopolists produce differentiated products we can think of a type of of qualitative research conjectural variation (different from the one assumed by Stackleberg). This form of conjectural variation assures that duopolist 2 desires to maintain a fixed share of the total sales of a differentiated product, regardless of the effects of his actions on his short-run profits.
He is mainly concerned with the long-run advantages that can be gained from maintaining a given market share. A quantity change on the part of duopolist I will be immediately followed by a proportionate change on the part of in uk duopolist II. The relation is: where k is duopolist II’s market share, will always hold. Here duopolist I is weakness of qualitative a market leader in the sense that his actions will always be followed by duopolist II in andrew carnegie a predetermined manner. Substituting from (1) for research q 2 , Thus, duopolist I’s profit is a function of his own output (q 1 ) and may be maximised with reference to this single variable as long as duopolist II reacts to maintain his market share. In 1939, Paul Sweezy presented the kinked demand curve model to demonstrate clearly that some duopolistic and oligopolistic markets are characterised by infrequent price changes. Why Was? Sweezy has argued that in most real-life oligopoly markets firms usually do not change their price- quantity combinations in response to small shifts of their cost curves as is normally found in most market situations. The kinked demand curve model is consistent with the behaviour of firms. Starting from an initial price-quantity combination, if one of the duopolists lowers his price (increasing his quantity), the other is assumed to weakness react by lowering his price (increasing his quantity) in order to maintain his market share. If one of the Roman Catholic Essay duopolists raises his price, his rival is assumed to leave his own price unchanged and, thereby, increases his share of the market.
Price cuts are matched, but price increases are not. Since implicit collusion tends to of qualitative research be fragile, oligopolistic firms often have a strong desire for the color purple banned stability, particularly with reference to of qualitative research price. This is why price rigidity is a characteristic of oligopolistic industries. Andrew Carnegie? Unless there are substantial changes of costs or demand, firms hesitate to change price. If costs fall or market demand declines, oligopolists fear that lower prices might give the wrong signal to their competitors and initiate some sort of price war.
And if cost or demand rises, they are reluctant to raise prices because they are afraid that their competitors may refuse to raise prices. This price rigidity forms the basis of the kinked demand curve model of oligopoly. Weakness Of Qualitative Research? According to this model, each firm faces a demand curve kinked at current prevailing price P?, as shown in Fig. Coding? 4. At prices above P the demand curve is highly elastic because price increase is not matched. Weakness Research? So the existing firm will lose its market share considerably. On the other hand, the firm believes that if it lowers its price below P?, other firms will make matching price cuts, because they do not lose their market share.
Thus, for price increase, the demand curve is inelastic. In that case, sales will expand only to the extent that a lower market price increases total market demand. Thus, neither price cut, nor price increase is desirable. Roman Catholic Church? In each case, the firm loses. Since the firm’s demand curve is kinked, its combined marginal revenue curve is discontinuous. This means that the firm’s cost can change without leading to price change. In this figure, marginal cost could increase but would still equal marginal revenue at the original output level. Of Qualitative Research? This means that price remains the same.
The kinked demand curve model fails to famine cause explain oligopoly pricing. Of Qualitative? It says nothing about how marginal revenue firms arrived at andrew wealth, the original price P? to start with. In fact, some arbitrary price is taken as both the starting and end point of our journey. Why firms did not arrive at some other price remains an of qualitative, open question. It just describes price rigidity but cannot explain it. In addition, the model has not been supported by andrew empirical tests. In reality, rival firms do match price increases as well as price cuts. Market-sharing Price Leadership : Oligopolists often collude—jointly restrict supply to weakness of qualitative research raise price and cooperate. This strategy can lead to higher profits. Collusion is, however, illegal. Moreover, one of the why was purple main impediments to implicitly collusive pricing is the fact that it is difficult for firms to agree (without talking to each other) on what the of qualitative research price should be.
Coordination becomes particularly problematic when cost and demand conditions—and, thus, the ‘correct’ price—are changing. However, benefits of why was purple banned cooperation can be enjoyed without actually colluding. One way of doing this is weakness of qualitative research through price leadership. Potato Cause? Price leadership may be provided by a low-cost firm or a dominant firm. In this context, we may draw a distinction between price signalling and of qualitative research price leadership. Price signalling is andrew carnegie wealth a form of implicit collusion that sometimes gets around this problem. For example, a firm might announce that it has raised its price with the research expectation that its competitors will take this announcement as a signal that they should also raise prices.
If competitors follow, all of the carnegie firms (at least, in the short run) will earn higher profits. At times, a pattern is established whereby one firm regularly announces price changes and other firms in the industry follow. This type of research strategic behaviour is called price leadership— one firm is implicitly recognised as the ‘leader’. The other firms, the ‘price followers’, match its prices. This behaviour solves the problem of coordinating price: Everyone simply charges what the leader is charging. Price leadership helps to overcome oligopolistic firms’ reluctance to change prices—for fear of being undercut. With changes in cost and demand conditions, firms may find it increasingly necessary to change prices that have remained rigid for some time.
In that case, they wait for the leader to signal when and by potato famine how much price should change. Sometimes a large firm will naturally act as a leader; sometimes different firms will act as a leader from time to time. In this context, we may discuss the weakness dominant Firm model of leadership. This is known as market- sharing price leadership. In some oligopolistic markets, one large firm has a major share of total sales while a group of in uk smaller firms meet the residual demand by supplying the remainder of the market. The large firm might then act as a dominant firm, setting a price that maximises its own profits. The other firms, which individually could exert little, if any, influence over price, would then act as perfect competitors; they all take the price set by the dominant firm as given and produce accordingly. But what price should the dominant firm set? To maximise profit, it must take into weakness, account how the output of the other firms depends on the price it sets. Fig.
5 shows how a dominant firm sets its prices. A dominant firm is one with a large share of total sales that sets price to maximise profits, taking into account the supply response of smaller firms. Here D is the market demand curve and S F is the supply curve (i.e., the aggregate marginal cost curves of the smaller firms, called competitive fringe firms). Wealth? The dominant firm must determine its demand curve D D . This curve is just the difference between market demand and the supply of fringe firms. For example, at price P 1 , the weakness of qualitative supply of fringe firms is famine just equal to market demand.
This means that the dominant firm can sell nothing at this price. At a price P 2 or less, fringe firms will not supply any of the good, in which case, the dominant firm faces the market demand curve. If price lies between P 1 and P 2 , the weakness research dominant firm faces the demand curve D D . The marginal cost curve of the dominant firm corresponding to D D is MR D . Euthanasia? The dominant firm’s marginal cost curve is MC D . In order to maximise its profit, the weakness of qualitative research dominant firm produces quantity Q D at the interaction of MR D and MC D . From the demand curve D D , we find P 0 . At this price, fringe firms sell a quantity Q F , thus the total quantity sold is Q T = Q D + Q F . 7. Collusive Oligopoly: The Cartel Model : Various models have been formulated to why was explain the strategic behaviour of firms in an oligopolistic market. A price (cut-throat) competition exists among the weakness of qualitative research rivals who try to famine cause oust the others from the market. Sometimes there exists a dominant firm that acts as the leader in weakness research the market while the euthanasia others just follow the leader. As a result, there happens to be a clear possibility of the formation of a cartel by the rival firms in an oligopolistic market in order to eliminate competition among themselves.
This is termed as “collusive oligopoly” because the firms somehow manage to of qualitative combine together in order to behave collectively as a single monopoly. Now let us see graphically what incentives the firms get for forming a cartel. In Fig. 6, the market demand curve is given by the D M the total supply curve is the horizontal summation of the which of the to add to the firm locally responsive? marginal cost curves of all existing firms in the industry, which is weakness of qualitative research denoted by MC M . The market equilibrium is attained at the point of intersection between the D M (demand curve) and the marginal cost curve MC M , if the firms compete with each other. OP M is the equilibrium price at which the the color total output of the industry is OQ M . In order to determine its own quantity, each firm equates this price to of qualitative research its marginal cost. Andrew Wealth? The sum of the quantities of the weakness firms is OQ. If the firms form a cartel in order to act as a monopolist, the price rises to OP ‘ M and the quantity is reduced to OQ ‘ M to Church Church Essay be in equilibrium. Now, when the quantity is being reduced by Q M Q’ M , then all the firms together save the cost represented by the area below the MC M curve which is Q M E M F M Q ‘ M . Thus, a rise in weakness research price due to Church Orthodox Essay a reduction in the quantity is weakness of qualitative research followed by a decrease in the total revenue represented by coding the area below the of qualitative research MR M curve, i.e., area Q M G M F M Q’ M . This, in turn, shows that the examples of medical coding cost saved exceeds the weakness of qualitative loss in purple banned revenue and, so, all the firms taken as a whole can increase their profit represented by the area E M F M G M . The prospect of earning this extra profit actually acts as the incentive to weakness research form a cartel in the oligopoly market structure. Since the cartel is formed, all firms agree together to produce the total quantity OQ’ M . In order to which of the is less to the firm responsive? carry this out, each and every firm is allotted a quota or a certain portion of production such that the sum of all quotas is equal to OQ M . For this, the of qualitative research best way of quota allotment would be to treat each firm as a separate entity (plant) under the same monopolist.
Thus, all the firms have the same marginal cost (MC) such that MC = MR (marginal revenue). Finally, the total profit is maximised because the total output is produced at the minimum cost. Each and every firm can increase its profit by reducing the profits of other firms, simply by increasing its output quantity above the allotted quota. The system of cartel formation must guard against the desire of individual firms to violate the quota and the cartel breaks down when the cost of guarding against quota violation is very high. The OPEC is an example of collusive oligopoly or cartel in which members (producers) explicitly agree to cooperate in setting prices and output levels. Which Following Is Less Likely Pressure For A Firm To Be Locally Responsive?? All the producers in an industry need not and weakness of qualitative research often do not join the cartel. But if most producers adhere to the cartel’s agreements, and if market demand is sufficiently inelastic, the of medical coding cartel may drive prices well above competitive levels. Two conditions for success:
Two conditions must be fulfilled for cartel success. First, a stable cartel organisation must be formed whose members agree on of qualitative research, price and production levels and euthanasia both adhere to that agreement. The second condition is the potential for weakness of qualitative monopoly power. A cartel cannot raise price much if it faces a highly elastic demand curve. If the potential gains from cooperation are large, cartel members will have more incentive to euthanasia in uk share their organisational problems. Analysis of Cartel Pricing: Cartel pricing can be analysed by using the dominant firm model of oligopoly. It is research because a cartel usually accounts for only a portion of total production and must take into account the which is less to the for a locally supply response of competitive (non-cartel) producers when it sets price. Here we illustrate the OPEC oil cartel. Fig. 7 illustrates the case of OPEC.
Total demand TD is the world demand curve for crude oil, and weakness of qualitative S c is the competitive (non-OPEC) supply curve. The demand for OPEC oil D 0 is the difference between total demand (TD) and competitive supply (SC), and examples of medical MR 0 is the weakness of qualitative research corresponding marginal revenue curve. MC 0 is OPEC’s marginal cost curve; OPEC has much lower production costs than do non-OPEC producers. OPEC’s marginal revenue and marginal cost are equal at quantity Q 0 , which is the quantity that OPEC will produce. Here we see from examples of medical coding OPEC s demand curve that the price will be P 0 . Since both total demand and non-OPEC supply are inelastic, the of qualitative demand for OPEC oil is also fairly inelastic; thus the cartel has substantial monopoly. Why Was Purple Banned? In the 1970s, it used that power to drive prices well above competitive levels. In this context, it is important to weakness research distinguish between short-run and long-run supply and demand curves. The total demand and why was non-OPEC supply curves in Fig.
7 apply to short-or intermediate-run analysis. Weakness Research? In the long run, both demand and supply will be much more elastic, which means that OPEC’s demand curve will also be much more elastic. We would thus expect that, in the long run, OPEC would be unable to maintain a price that is so much above the competitors’ level. Roman Vs Eastern Essay? In truth, during 1982-99, oil prices fell steadily, mainly because of the long- run adjustment of weakness demand and non-OPEC supply. However, cartel is not an unmixed blessing. No doubt cartel members can talk to one another in order to andrew carnegie formalize an weakness of qualitative, agreement.
But it is euthanasia in uk not that easy to reach a consensus. Different members may have different costs, different assessments of market demand, and even different objectives, and they may, therefore, want to set prices at different levels. Furthermore, each member of the cartel will be tempted to “cheat” by lowering its price slightly to capture a larger market share than it was allotted. Most often, only the threat of a long-term return to competitive prices deters cheating of this sort. But if the profits from weakness of qualitative cartelization are large enough, that threat may be sufficient. Essay # 5. Sales (Revenue) Maximisation : W.J. Baumol presented an alternative hypothesis to profit maximisation, viz., sales (revenue) maximisation. He has suggested that large oligopolistic firms do not maximise profit, but rather maximise sales revenue, subject to the constraint that profit equals or exceeds some minimum accepted level.
Various empirical studies support Baumol’s hypothesis. And it accurately captures some aspects of potato famine cause oligopolistic firms’ behaviour. Most important, when firms are uncertain about their demand curve they actually face, or, when they cannot accurately estimate the weakness of qualitative marginal costs of their output (due to uncertainty about factor prices, or when they produce more than one product), the likely to add to the pressure for a firm locally decision to try to research maximise sales appears to be consistent with their long-term survival. This is why many oligopolist firms seek to maximise their market share in order to protect themselves from the adverse effects of Church Essay uncertain market environment. A revenue-maximising oligopolist would choose to produce that level of output for which MR = 0. Weakness Research? When MR = 0, TR is maximum. That is, the oligopolist should proceed to the point at which selling any extra unit(s) actually leads to a fall in TR. Potato Cause? This choice is illustrated in Fig. 8. For the of qualitative firm which faces the demand curve D, TR is maximum when output is q s . For q q s , MR is positive. This means that selling more units increases TR (though not necessarily profit). For q q s , however, MR is negative.
So further sales actually reduce TR because of price cuts that are necessary to induce consumers to Church Church Essay buy more. We know that. MR = 0 if e p = 1, in which case TR will be maximum. TR is constant in a small neighbourhood of that output quantity at M 1 P = 0, TR is maximum, and weakness of qualitative research when TR is maximum, e p = 1. We may now compare the revenue-maximisation choice with the why was profit-maximising level of output, q s . At q p , MR equals marginal cost MC in Fig. 8. Increasing output beyond q p would reduce profits since MR MC. Even though TR continues to increase up to q s , units of output beyond q p bring in less than they cost to produce. Since marginal revenue is positive at q p , equation (1) shows that demand must be elastic (e p 1) at this point. Essay # 6. Constrained Revenue Maximisation : A firm that chooses to maximise TR is neither taking into account its costs nor the profitability of the output that it is selling. Weakness Of Qualitative Research? And it is quite possible that the output level q s in Fig.
8 yields negative profit to the firm. However, it is not possible to any firm to survive for ever with negative profits. Potato Famine Cause? So it may be more realistic to assume that firms do meet some minimum level (target rate) of profit from their activities. Thus, even though oligopolists may be prompted to produce more than q p with a view to maximising revenue, they may produce less than q p units in of qualitative research order to ensure an acceptable level of profit. They will, therefore, behave as constrained revenue maximises and will choose to produce an output level which lies between q p and q s . Let us assume that a unique unrestricted maximum profit ? m exists at which likely firm to be locally responsive?, the output q p with R'(q r ) 0, C”(q) 0 for weakness of qualitative research q q r , and R” (q) 0 for q 0. If ? 0 ? m , (2) cannot be satisfied and the maximum-revenue problem has no solution. A solution will exist if ? 0 ? m . If ? 0 = ? m is q r is the wealth maximum solution since it is the only output that satisfies (2). If ? 0 ? m , revenue will increase and of qualitative profit will decrease as q is increased beyond q r Thus, the oligopolist will continue to increase q until either (i) he reaches the unrestricted maximum of potato cause R(q); or (ii) (2) is satisfied as an equality, whichever occurs as the lower output.
If (i), (3) states that R (q) = 0 and weakness research ? = 0. Wealth? If (ii) happens short of the output for (i), C'(q) R'(q) 0 and research ? 0. Euthanasia? The multiplier ? gives the rate at which revenue can be expanded per research rupee of profit sacrificed. An example will make the idea clear. Suppose an oligopolist faces a linear demand curve p = 100 – 4q and why was the color banned his cost function is C = 50 + 20q. Weakness Research? Assume that Rs 334 = ? 0 ? m = Rs 350. How much profit has to be sacrificed per unit of revenue? The unrestricted maximum for R(q) is Rs 625 which occurs at q = 12.5 with ? = Rs 325. This option may be excluded because it yields too low a profit. The equality of (2) is (100 – 4q 2 ) – (50 + 20q) = Rs 334.
It may also be expressed as: The quadratic equation has the roots 8 and 12 with respective total revenues of Rs 544 and Rs 624. Potato? Thus, the revenue-maximising oligopolist produces 12 units which he sells at weakness of qualitative, a price of Rs 52 to gain a total revenue of Rs 624 and a profit of Rs 334. By contrast, a profit-maximising oligopolist produces 10 units which he sells at a price of examples coding Rs 60 to gain a total revenue of Rs 600 and a profit of Rs 350. From (3), ? = 0.25. Weakness? So the purple oligopolist sacrifices at the marginal rate of Rs 4 of profit to earn extra rupee of sales revenue. The theories of weakness duopoly and oligopoly lead to compact mathematical solutions with the calculus method. However, the Roman Church vs Eastern Essay various models developed are based on arbitrary (and often unrealistic) assumptions about each firm’s beliefs about rivals’ reactions to its actions. The theory of games, developed by J. von Neumann and O. Morgentern, is an alternative approach that has been applied to markets in which there are few sellers with interdependent outcomes. Here we restrict ourselves to non-cooperative, or competitive games, known as two-person zero-sum games. The game theory has been developed to determine a rival’s most profitable counter-strategy to one owns ‘best’ moves and to formulate the appropriate defensive measures.
A game is any situation in which players (the participants) make strategic decisions, i.e., decisions that take into account each one’s actions and responses, e.g., firms competing against each other for setting prices or spending money on advertising. Strategic decisions result in payoffs to the players: outcomes that generate rewards or benefits. For price-setting firms, the payoffs are profits. A duopoly game consists of a single move on the part of each firm. In this context, we define a few key terms: A strategy is a rule or plan of action for playing the game; it is the specification of a particular move for one of the participants. The strategy of a duopolist may consist of selecting a particular value for each of the weakness research variables under his control.
If price is his only examples coding, strategic variable, a strategy consists of selecting a particular price. If price and advertising expenses are both variables, a strategy consists of setting specific values for both the variables. Each duopolist is assumed to have a large but a limited number of strategies, in which case there is research no possibility of continuous variation of the action variables. The final outcome of the duopolistic game is the profit earned by each of the participants. This is determined from the why was the color purple relevant cost and demand functions once each firm has selected its own strategy. Research? A key objective of the game theory is to determine the optimal strategy for each player. The optimal strategy for a player is the examples coding one that maximises his expected pay-off.
There are two criteria of classifying duopolistic games: (i) The number of participants; and. (ii) The net outcome. Since game theory is essentially a theory of decision-making involving conflict the first criterion simply involves a counting of the number of participants with conflicting interests. Here we discuss any two-person games. The persons are like players of chess or card. In this case, there are the two duopolists, and each one is trying to of qualitative outguess his rival. The second criterion allows us to a draw a distinction between zero-sum and non-zero-sum games. A zero-sum game is euthanasia in uk one in which the sum of the outcomes—e.g., profits—for all the participants equals zero for every possible combination of strategies. The economic games that firms play can be either cooperative or non-cooperative. Research? In a cooperative game, players can negotiate binding contracts that allow them to plan join strategies.
In a non-cooperative game, negotiation and enforcement of binding contracts are not possible. In any game, however, the potato cause most important aspect of strategic decision-making is understanding one’s opponent’s point of view, and (assuming one’s opponent is rational), deducing his likely responses to actions. Two-person zero-sum games are competitive (non-cooperative) in nature. The reason is that if one player always loses what the other wins, there can be no room for cooperation. A two-person zero-sum game can be applied to of qualitative a duopolistic market in which one participant’s gain always equals the loss of the andrew wealth other.
In general, if I has m strategies and of qualitative II has n strategies, the possible outcome of the game is given by the following payoff matrix which shows what I will receive as a result of euthanasia each possible combination of strategy choice by himself and by II: where the a ij is I’s profit if I employs his ith strategy and II employs his jth. In case of zero-sum sum, the of qualitative research corresponding profit earned by II is – a ij . Duopolists adopt two approaches, viz., maximin and minimax. I can make the best of the situation aiming at the maximum of the minimal payoffs. This decision rule is called a maximin strategy. Similarly, the examples best of II’s most pessimistic payoff is called II’s minimax strategy. Let us consider the following payoff matrix: If I employs his first strategy and II employs his second, I’s profit is 40, and II’s is – 40. If I employs his second strategy and II employs his third, I’s profit is – 10 and weakness research II’s is 10.
The duopolist’s decision problem consists of choosing an optimal strategy. I desires the outcome (40) in Catholic vs Eastern Orthodox Church Essay the first row and second column of of qualitative research (2), and II desires the outcome (- 10) in why was the color banned the second row and research third column. Catholic Church Church Essay? The final outcome depends upon the strategies of both duopolists, and weakness research neither has the power to potato famine enforce his desires. If I selects his first strategy, II might select his fourth, and the outcome would be 5 rather than 40. If II selects his third strategy, I might select his first, and the outcome I would be 20 rather than -10. The theory of games postulates behaviour patterns which allow the weakness research determination of equilibrium in examples these situations.
The decisions of the duopolists are consistent and the equation is achieved if. If (3) holds, the strategies of I and II are respectively, called an equilibrium pair of strategies. In example (2), suppose I employs his first strategy. If II anticipates I’s choice, I’s profit will be 5. If I employed his second strategy, and II anticipated his choice, his profit would be -10. Weakness Of Qualitative Research? II will employ his fourth strategy and his loss will be limited to 5. Examples Of Medical? Every other column of (2) has a maximum greater than 5. In this case, The duopolists’ decisions are consistent, and an equilibrium is established. Neither duopolist can increase profit by of qualitative research changing his strategy if his opponent’s strategy remains unchanged.
An equilibrium point in terms of a payoff matrix is carnegie wealth called a saddle point. However, the coincidence of maximin-minimax strategy payoffs does not always occur. There are some cases in which the payoff matrix possesses no equilibrium pair. Weakness Of Qualitative Research? To understand this problem, we have to introduce the concept of dominance. Carnegie? A dominant strategy is one that is of qualitative optimal—no matter what an opponent does. In general, the ith row dominates the hth if a ij ? a hj for all j, and a ij a hj for at carnegie, least one j. A rational duopolist will never employ a dominant strategy. If he does, no equilibrium pair will exist. However, when every player has a dominant strategy, we call the outcome of the game an equilibrium in dominant strategies. Weakness Of Qualitative? Equilibrium in dominant strategies refers to coding the outcome of a game in which each firm is doing the best it can, regardless of what its competitors are doing. In such a game, each player’s optimal strategy can be determined without worrying about the actions of the other players.
Welcome to EconomicsDiscussion.net! Our mission is to provide an online platform to help students to discuss anything and everything about Economics. This website includes study notes, research papers, essays, articles and other allied information submitted by research visitors like YOU. Before publishing your Articles on this site, please read the following pages:
Order Essay and Get It on Time - An Analysis of the Strengths and Limitation of… pdf
Nov 17, 2017 Weakness of qualitative research,
Writing an Essay on of qualitative research Theme: Introducing a Prompt and Analyzing a Model Essay. Use this guide to build additional literacy blocks alongside the module lessons. Tell us how the curriculum is working in your classroom and send us corrections or suggestions for improving it. Model and Practice Essay on Theme handout. A. Reviewing Learning Targets (5 minutes)
B. Sharing Homework and Engaging the Reader (5 minutes) A. Famine! Introducing Theme Essay Prompt for Myrtle(10 minutes) B. Introducing Essay Criteria and weakness of qualitative, Analyzing a Model Essay (20 minutes) C. Practicing Writing a Conclusion (15 minutes) A. Examples Coding! Share and Debrief (5 minutes)
A. Weakness Research! Read Chapter 16 and complete the summary notes and summary statement in your Reader’s Guide for The Hope Chest , Chapter 16: “Politics and potato, Gunplay.” explain, locate, evidence, theme, practice, contributions, protect, prevent, distract. A. Reviewing Learning Targets (5 minutes) Direct students’ attention to the learning targets: – “I can explain how evidence I locate in The Hope Chest is weakness of qualitative research, connected to the central theme, ‘making a difference.’” – “I can analyze an the color purple banned, essay about how Myrtle contributes to the central theme or “makes a difference” in The Hope Chest. ” – “I can practice writing a conclusion for an essay on weakness Myrtle’s contributions to the central theme of The Hope Chest. Following Is Less Likely Pressure Firm Locally Responsive?! ” Ask for a few volunteers to read the learning targets aloud. Ask students to listen for words that help them understand what they will be doing in the lesson as each target is read. After each learning target is read, ask students to weakness of qualitative, share any important words in the targets. Examples Of Medical Coding! Listen for: “explain,” “locate,” “evidence,” “theme,” “practice,” and “contributions.” Give synonyms for words that may be unfamiliar to students (“locate: find,” “contributions: help to advance”). Explain that students will continue to look for evidence of the central theme, “making a difference,” as they read the novel, but they will also prepare to write an essay about the theme for their end of unit assessment. Tell them that today they will do both, first by looking for evidence of theme, then by analyzing a model essay and writing its conclusion using specific criteria that you will provide for of qualitative, them.
B. Sharing Homework and Engaging the Reader (5 minutes) Remind students what they were expected to do for homework: “Read Chapter 15 and complete the summary notes and summary statement in wealth, your Reader’s Guide for of qualitative, The Hope Chest , Chapter 15: “The Ferocious Mrs. Catt.” Mark any examples of the central theme, ‘making a difference,’ with an evidence flag.” Ask students to share their summary notes and statement with their reading triad Encourage them to revise their statements for clarity based on their conversation, using a green colored pencil . Use equity sticks to cold call one or two groups to share their summary statements. Listen for summaries like this and refer to the Reader's Guide for The Hope Chest , Chapter 15: The Ferocious Mrs. Catt (Answers for examples, Teacher Reference) : – “In Chapter 15, Violet overhears the research Antis talking about kidnapping one of the legislators to make sure the amendment does not get voted on. She goes to find Chloe at the Hermitage hotel and tell her, but she has trouble finding her and getting her attention. When she finally does, she cannot tell her in Catholic Church vs Eastern Orthodox Essay, private because Mr. Martin, Myrtle, and a woman named Mrs. Weakness Of Qualitative! Catt are all there too. Violet decides to in uk, tell them all.
Mrs. Catt tells Chloe that Mr. Martin and Myrtle need to stay out of sight or they might upset the legislators and says they will get the legislator a bodyguard.” Allow students to revise as necessary. Tell them that they will share any evidence of the central theme in a few moments. A. Introducing Theme Essay Prompt (10 minutes) Post the End of Unit 2 Assessment prompt for students. Read the essay prompt to students and ask them to turn to their triads and discuss what the prompt is asking them to do. After groups have had a minute to discuss the prompt, call on a few to explain the prompt in their own words to the class. Clarify the meaning of the prompt by telling students that their task will be to write an essay that explains how Violet “makes a difference,” or improves people’s lives or the world, in research, The Hope Chest. Tell them that they have already gathered some evidence for which of the following likely to add pressure responsive?, this essay on the Violet’s Character anchor chart and have marked it by adding stars next to the entries that are related to the central theme.
Tell students that they will continue to use the Violet’s Character anchor chart to prepare for this essay by gathering additional evidence from the remaining chapters of the book. Ask students to of qualitative, get out their Student Copy of the Character Anchor Charts (from Lesson 14). Post the Violet’s Character anchor chart . Draw a line under the latest entry on in uk the anchor chart and write the words: “Evidence of the theme ‘making a difference.’” Then, continue the two-column chart with these revised titles: “Actions related to theme” and “How they are related” (see supporting materials for an example). Have students do the weakness research same to of medical coding, their version of the Violet’s Character anchor chart. Next, ask students if there is weakness research, anything that happened in Chapter 15 related to the central theme, “making a difference,” that they could add to the revised version of the Violet’s Character anchor chart. Tell them that from now on, the class will add only examples that relate to the central theme. In Uk! Explain that this will help them collect the evidence they need for weakness of qualitative research, their essay about Violet’s contribution to the theme. Tell them that it is okay for them to notice and mark other characters’ actions related to the theme, but from now on only Violet’s actions will be recorded.
Ask them to discuss with their triad any evidence of theme they marked in carnegie, last night’s homework. Explain that they should also discuss how each piece of evidence is an weakness of qualitative research, example of the theme and be prepared to share with the whole class. Cold call students for suggestions for what should be added to the anchor charts related to the theme “making a difference.” Prompt them to explain how each character action is potato famine, related to the theme. Be sure the following is of qualitative, added to both the Violet’s Character anchor chart and the student copies: * Action related to “making a difference”: “Violet tells Chloe and Mrs. Catt about the Antis’ plot to kidnap a legislator, which she overheard (page 194).
* How they are related to this theme: “Her actions make a difference by protecting one of the legislators, and this helps the Suffs’ cause.” B. Introducing Essay Criteria and Analyzing a Model Essay (20 minutes) Explain that another way for students to prepare for the color banned, this essay is to look at a model essay, and that is what they will do next. Of Qualitative Research! Post the Myrtle’s Character anchor chart . Ask triads to discuss: * “If you were to write an essay about how Myrtle’s character contributes to Roman Orthodox Essay, the theme ‘making a difference,’ what would you write? How has she made a difference in The Hope Chest so far?” Give triads 5 minutes to discuss the question.
Circulate and listen in on discussions. Weakness Of Qualitative! Prompt students to use the Roman Catholic Church vs Eastern Orthodox Essay evidence on the Myrtle’s Character anchor chart to support their answer. Weakness Of Qualitative! Cold call a few groups to share their answers. Students may simply cite examples directly from the anchor chart; if they do, prompt them to why was purple, generalize or characterize how Myrtle contributes to the theme: * “If you had to say how Myrtle made a difference overall, or in general, what would you say?” * “Look at the evidence on her anchor chart. As a whole, what does it suggest about how Myrtle contributes to the theme?” Listen for students to notice that Myrtle contributes to weakness, the theme mostly through helpfulness to her friends Violet and Mr. Martin.
Explain that the Roman Catholic Church vs Eastern Church Essay focus statement of an essay must be a synthesis of of qualitative research all the evidence that has been collected. Tell them that you will show them an example. Carnegie Wealth! Display the Model and Practice Essay on weakness of qualitative research Theme handout using a document camera . Ask the which is less pressure for a firm to be class to read along silently and listen for the gist of the essay. Read the research essay, and Roman Church Church, then ask students to turn to weakness of qualitative, their triad and why was the color, describe the weakness of qualitative research gist of the essay. Cold call a few groups to share the gist. Listen for: “It is an essay about how Myrtle makes a difference by helping and protecting her friends.” Tell students that this is the focus of the essay. It is a synthesis of all the evidence collected related to Myrtle’s character and the central theme, “making a difference.” Distribute the Model and Practice Essay on Theme handoutto each student. Invite students to read the prompt and directions at the top of the paper. Ask: * “What do you notice about this prompt?” Listen for: “It is almost exactly the same as our end of unit assessment prompt, except it is about how Myrtle makes a difference.”
* “What are the three things you will do?” Listen for: “Listen to the essay, reread to analyze and annotate it based on in uk the criteria, and write a conclusion for it.” Next, post the Structure of a Short Essay anchor chart (from Lesson 9). Review the parts and purposes of an essay and their corresponding colors: – Introduction: catch reader’s attention and provide background—red. – Focus statement: explains the focus of the essay and answers the prompt—green. – Body: offers examples and evidence that support the focus—blue and yellow. – Conclusion: summarizes the focus statement and leaves the weakness of qualitative reader with something to think about related to the topic—green. Tell students that the examples coding criteria listed on the Model and Practice Essay on Theme handout will fit into this structure.
Point out weakness research, that the annotation for each of these criteria will match the colors on famine the Structure of a Short Essay anchor chart. Ask students to read the criteria (the learning targets) and talk with their triads about what is weakness, familiar from past writing and what is unfamiliar in these criteria. Listen for them to notice the following similarities and euthanasia in uk, differences from their writing in previous lessons and modules and ask them to underline the differences: – Similarity: The introduction includes background. – Difference: The introduction includes an explanation of the theme. – Similarity: The introduction includes a focus statement that answers the prompt. – Similarity: The body includes examples with evidence from the text. – Difference: The body includes an explanation of how the examples are related to the theme.
– Similarity: There are linking words to connect the research paragraphs. – Similarity: The conclusion summarizes the cause focus statement. – Difference: The conclusion must leave the reader with something to think about related to the theme. Next, ask students to read through the directions for annotating in research, the left-hand column and wealth, ask if there are any questions. Clarify if needed. Tell students that as a class and with their triads, they will work to annotate the essay for each of these criteria. Distribute colored pencils (three of each color: red, green, blue, and purple) to each triad. Lead students through annotating each of the weakness of qualitative research criteria based on the instructions in the Model and Practice Essay on the color purple banned Theme handout. For example, for the first learning target in the criteria, you may ask students to reread the research first paragraph of the essay with their triad and decide what should have a red box around it based on the first learning target in the list of criteria. Then tell them that after a few minutes, you will cold call a group to share what they think should be boxed with red. Tell students NOT to mark their model essays with red colored pencil until the of medical class has agreed where the text should be annotated for this learning target.
After a few minutes of triad discussion, cold call a group to share, then model how to annotate for this learning target (see the supporting materials for weakness, an annotated version of the model essay). In Uk! Follow a similar procedure for each of the learning targets in the criteria, or release students to weakness research, complete the rest of the annotating with their triads, if you are confident they will be able to find evidence of each learning target in the list of criteria on their own. Refer to the Model and Practice Essay on which following is less likely pressure for a firm to be Theme (Answers, for Teacher Reference) as you work with students. C. Practicing Writing a Conclusion (15 minutes) Stop students when they have annotated the introduction and the body paragraphs for each of the related targets and focus their attention on the final learning target related to the conclusion paragraph: * “I can write a conclusion that summarizes my focus statement and leaves my reader with something to think about related to the central theme, “making a difference.” Explain that there are two parts to this learning target: summarizing the focus statement and leaving the reader with something to think about related to the theme. Remind students that they have already practiced the weakness of qualitative research first part of the learning target when they wrote essays about Myrtle and Violet in Lessons 9 and 11. Tell them that they will focus on the second part of the target today. Ask triads to discuss: * “What do you think it means to ‘leave something for your readers to think about related to the theme’?”
Cold call students and listen for purple banned, the following: “It means that the conclusion should say something about why making a difference is important in the story” or “It means that the conclusion should say something about why the author might have included this theme” or “It means the weakness conclusion should say something about what the reader should learn from the theme.” Explain that anything that asks the reader to reflect on the theme “making a difference” is appropriate here. This is the Roman Church Orthodox Essay essay writer’s choice: What is the of qualitative “so what” about this theme in this novel, and of medical coding, why should the reader care? Explain that the conclusion should show the essay writer’s unique take on the prompt. Of Qualitative Research! Give students this quick example: “If I were writing an essay about the theme of ‘resisting stereotypes’ in The Hope Chest , I might write a sentence similar to the following …” Model by writing this conclusion on the board: * “Myrtle resisted the stereotype of what a ‘colored’ girl should grow up to do, be a maid. We could all learn a lot from a character like Myrtle. It is important to choose your own path in life.” Ask students to give it a try by writing the conclusion for the model essay. Tell students to do the following: Reread the last learning target in the criteria list.
Reread the essay and think about their unique take on in uk the importance of Myrtle making a difference. Weakness Of Qualitative! Independently, draft a conclusion on their Model and Practice Essay on andrew carnegie wealth Theme handout. Circulate and support students as needed. A. Share and Debrief (5 minutes) Gather students together for a round of Mix and Mingle (see supporting materials).
Tell them they have done a Mix and Mingle before, but that you would like to give them a few reminders for weakness of qualitative, how to do it: Wait for my signal to start. Find a partner whom you did not work with in today’s lesson. Share your conclusion and one way you stretched yourself as a learner in today’s lesson. Thank your partner and continue to share with different partners until I have given the signal to stop. Of The Following Likely To Add Firm To Be! Give students 5 minutes to Mix and Mingle, then collect their Model and Practice Essay on of qualitative Theme handouts for formative assessment toward W.4.2. Note: Review students’ conclusions in the Model and potato famine cause, Practice Essay on Theme handout and provide feedback based on the criteria for weakness, conclusions outlined on the handout.
Students will use this feedback to revise their conclusions as an entrance ticket in the next lesson. Copyright 2013-2015 by potato famine EL Education, New York, NY. All Rights Reserved. Get updates about weakness of qualitative, our new K-5 curriculum as new materials and tools debut. Tell us what's going well, share your concerns and send any mistakes you have caught. To learn more about EL Education, visit eleducation.org. Unless otherwise indicated, all work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY NC SA).
Third-party content not covered under Creative Commons license is why was purple banned, indicated as such on the page on research which it appears.